Rozličné diskuse na psychospirituální, paranormální, ale i veděckofantastická témata

Akaforty píše:

Nádhera, krásně jsi tu zhrnul můj thread Koncept pozorovatelného vesmíru:))

darren-spencer
myslím,že na zemi nejsme jediný,,a ufoni existují.

Ano věřím. a zde bych se chtěl zeptat.Byla křištálová lebka dílem Májů?Nebo mimozemské civilizace?

Prý je to celé podvod a pocházejí z Evropy,
devatenáctého století.

ALE možná tvůrce mimozemšťané, či někdo jiný ovlivňoval.

Tvrdost té lebky je na stupnici 7.To by musely brousit diamanty.A ty optické vlastnosti co má.Myslím že na to tenkrát technika nestačila.

Jsou z křišťálu (křemene),
kameny této skupiny, jako je třeba růženín nebo ametyst se v té době dávno opracovávaly.
Mluvíme o 19. století.

Stupnice tvrdosti

1. Mastek,
2. Sádrovec,
3. Kalcit,
4. Fluorit,
5. Apatit,
6. Ortoklas,
7. Křemen,
8. Topaz,
9. Korund,
10. Diamant.

Známější podání stupnice tvrdosti drahých kamenů je učebnicově známá podoba: 1. Mastek, 2. Sůl kamenná, 3. Kalcit, 4. Fluorit, 5. Apatit, 6. Živec, 7. Křemen, 8. Topaz, 9. Korund, 10. Diamant

Takže, jak vidíš, nepotřebuješ diamant k opracování,
ale i kdyby, tuším, že i to by v té době už šlo.

Dobře dejme to mu že máš pravdu.Ale jak mi vysvětlíš že tam nejsou stopy po opracování.Každý nástrojnechá stopu i kdybys to leštila jek chtěla.Jsem vyučen ve skle.Takže vím že i po vyleštění jsou vidět stopy.je pravda že laik to nepozná.Protože neví co má hledat.

Tady je text v angličtině o jedné, osobně jsem je neviděla a ni nevyšetřovala.

"Perhaps the most famous and enigmatic skull was allegedly discovered in 1924 by Anna Le Guillon Mitchell-Hedges, adopted daughter of British adventurer and popularist author F.A. Mitchell-Hedges. It is the subject of a video documentary made in 1990, Crystal Skull of Lubaantun.[21] It has been noted upon examination by Smithsonian researchers to be "very nearly a replica of the British Museum skull--almost exactly the same shape, but with more detailed modeling of the eyes and the teeth."[22] Anna Hedges claimed that she found the skull buried under a collapsed altar inside a temple in Lubaantun, in British Honduras, now Belize.[23] As far as can be ascertained, F.A. Mitchell-Hedges himself made no mention of the alleged discovery in any of his writings on Lubaantun. Also, others present at the time of the excavation have not been documented as noting either the skull's discovery or Anna's presence at the dig.[24]

In a 1970 letter, Anna also stated that she was, "told by the few remaining Maya that the skull was used by the high priest to will death."[25] For this reason, the artifact is sometimes referred to as "The Skull of Doom". An alternative explanation[who?] is a play on 'Skull of Dunn' (Dunn being an associate of Mitchell-Hedges)[citation needed]. Anna Mitchell-Hedges toured with the skull from 1967 exhibiting it on a pay-per-view basis,[26] and she continued to give interviews about the artifact until her death in 2007.

The skull is made from a block of clear quartz about the size of a small human cranium, measuring some 5 inches (13 cm) high, 7 inches (18 cm) long and 5 inches wide. The lower jaw is detached. In the early 1970s it came under the temporary care of freelance art restorer Frank Dorland, who claimed upon inspecting it that it had been "carved" with total disregard to the natural crystal axes without the use of metal tools. Dorland reported being unable to find any tell-tale scratch marks, except for traces of mechanical grinding on the teeth, and he speculated that it was first chiseled into rough form, probably using diamonds, and the finer shaping, grinding and polishing was achieved through the use of sand over a period of 150 to 300 years. He said it could be up to 12,000 years old. Although various claims have been made over the years regarding the skull's physical properties, such as an allegedly constant temperature of 70 °F (21 °C), Dorland reported that there was no difference in properties between it and other natural quartz crystals.[27]

While in Dorland's care the skull came to the attention of writer Richard Garvin, at the time working at an advertising agency where he supervised Hewlett-Packard's advertising account. Garvin made arrangements for the skull to be examined at HP's crystal labs at Santa Clara, where it was subjected to several tests. The labs determined only that it was not a composite (as Dorland had supposed), but that it was fashioned from a single crystal of quartz.[28] The lab test also established that the lower jaw had been fashioned from the same left-handed growing crystal as the rest of the skull.[29] No investigation was made by HP as to its method of manufacture or dating.[30]

As well as the traces of mechanical grinding on the teeth noted by Dorland,[31] Mayanist archaeologist Norman Hammond reported that the holes (presumed to be intended for support pegs) showed signs of being made by drilling with metal.[32] Anna Mitchell-Hedges refused subsequent requests to submit the skull for further scientific testing.[33]

F. A. Mitchell-Hedges mentioned the skull only briefly in the first edition of his autobiography, Danger My Ally (1954), without specifying where or by whom it was found.[34] He merely claimed that "it is at least 3,600 years old and according to legend it was used by the High Priest of the Maya when he was performing esoteric rites. It is said that when he willed death with the help of the skull, death invariably followed".[35] All subsequent editions of Danger My Ally omitted mention of the skull entirely.[33]
Eugène Boban, main French dealer in pre-Columbian artifacts during the second half of the 19th century and probable source of many famous skulls

The earliest published reference to the skull is the July 1936 issue of the British anthropological journal Man, where it is described as being in the possession of Mr. Sydney Burney, a London art dealer who is said to have owned it since 1933.[36] No mention was made of Mitchell-Hedges. There is documentary evidence that Mitchell-Hedges bought it from Burney in 1944.[33] The skull was in the custody of Anna Mitchell-Hedges, the adopted daughter of Frederick. She steadfastly refused to let it be examined by experts (making very doubtful the claim that it was reported on by R. Stansmore Nutting in 1962). Somewhere between 1988–1990 Anna Mitchell-Hedges toured with the skull.

In her last eight years, Anna Mitchell-Hedges lived in Chesterton, Indiana, with Bill Homann, whom she married in 2002. She died on April 11, 2007. Since that time the Mitchell-Hedges Skull has been in the custody of Bill Homann. In April 2009, Five, a UK television channel, took the story and revealed that the Mitchell-Hedges Skull, recently tested under a special microscope in the Smithsonian Institution, had been manufactured with tools that Aztecs and Mayans simply did not have. Like the other skulls, this one is a fabrication dating from the second half of the 19th century. Bill Homann however continues to believe in its mystical properties."

WIKI

pěkný článek míro,křištalová lebka je užasná záhada,kdo by jí nechtěl vlastnit.

A co kdyby to setkání dopadlo takhle http://www.uloz.to/8380622/battle-los-a ... -filmu-avi

mira8565 píše:http://tajomstva.org/mimozemstania/unosy-mimozemstany-a-mozkove-implantaty/

Přínosný a obsáhlý článek

Myslím, že pokud se v blízkosti naší Země nachází nějací mimozemšťané, pak ovládají nejen vyspělou techniku, ale pravděpodobně znají také různé paranormální schopnosti.

Asi musejí být vyspělejší když tak hodně cestují.

Vyspělejší by být měli, a to pravděpodobně technicky - jak jinak by se sem, do této sluneční soustavy, dostali? Teoreticky by ještě mohli cestovat skrz dimenze, popřípadě skloubení obojího, ale to už nechám na nich :) A stejně tak je pravděpodobné, že ve vesmíru existují i méně rozvinuté formy života/civilizace, než je ta naše.